![]() The motives and reasons for carrying out any action play an insignificant role in determining if a decision is ethical or not. The utilitarianism approach explains that the decisions made by individuals rely on the consequences yielded to determine their ethical nature. Ethical decisions yield positive results, thus maximizing benefits while reducing harms. Utilitarianism focuses on explaining that every choice undertaken has a consequence. According to Stuart, consequences for various actions have a significant impact. Utilitarianism, as explained by Stuart, differs from Kant’s view on the issue of consequences. This paper compares Emmanuel Kant’s views with utilitarianism as the most potent approaches to ethics. Although the two approaches on ethics differ, they have a similar objective, which explains ethics. Therefore, the theory of utilitarianism is not correct in holding that individuals only maximize utility and minimize harms. ![]() Unlike utilitarianism concepts, Kant claims that morality goes beyond outward vices and virtues. In his book, ‘The groundwork for the metaphysics of morals,’ Kant expands his philosophical research to cover morality (Allison 111). On the other hand, Emmanuel Kant’s views on morality are clear in his moral law and his propositions on ethics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |